I saw this bit of cheery news while I was on the bus. A recent report says that the
FDA is critically underfunded. Among the "plethora of inadequacies":
•Inadequate inspections of manufacturers, noting that foodmakers, for example, are inspected about once every 10 years.
•A "badly broken" food-import system and food supply "that grows riskier each year." In the past 35 years, FDA inspections of the food supply have dropped 78% due to soaring numbers of products and inadequate FDA funding.
•A depleted FDA staff, which is about the same size as it was 15 years ago despite huge growth in agency responsibilities. Instead of being proactive, the agency is often in "fire-fighting" mode.
•A workforce with a "dearth" of scientists who understand emerging technologies. Turnover rates in some scientific positions at the FDA run twice that of other government agencies.
•An "obsolete" information-technology system.
In case you weren't picking up on the general theme here:
William Hubbard, a former FDA associate commissioner who supports the Coalition for a Stronger FDA, says the report stands out because of the "intensity of the feelings" expressed by the subcommittee.
"These people were horrified by what they found," he says. While the subcommittee was supposed to look ahead to where the FDA needs to be, Hubbard says it came away concluding that "it cannot even do its job now."
2 comments:
Bad news from Kellogg today. You'll have to place all your chips on U of C, but I'm not feeling very positive at the moment.
Oh, I'm so sorry to hear that. I just want you to get in damn near everywhere you apply (re: Kellogg, screw them), so that you have choice.
Go U of C. I'll tell my friend to work her crazy mojo on them.
Post a Comment